As some of you might be aware, I sometimes post comments on the Guardian website under my alter-ego "deadrockstar" and invariably the level of my criticism usually results in me touching a nerve and being pilloried for my opinions.
I made a fairly short assessment of the supremely awful Nick Cave-fuelled "Grinderman" release Super Heathen Child on their website and I was somewhat surprised to see it picked up and noted in the diary of Robert Fripp. My critique was short and to the point because the quality of the music dictated the amount of energy I should expend in order to warn people of how much of a turkey this thing was. I kept it short:
"What a load of old bollocks. The wailings of Fripp save it from being a complete musical turd."
Unfortunately, this isn't the correct way to review music and I have been correctly castigated by Mr Fripp by this suitably verbose rebuttal:
So, what are these posters, given these clearly expressed attitudes?
It continues to surprise me; even having been for 43 years close to publicly declared unkindness, nastiness, resentment & hostility towards those who have the presumption to play music in front of others; that anyone would seek to wander out in the full view of public gaze and show their fundamental lacking in courtesy & grace, by presenting an opinion that is not even sufficiently developed to quite qualify as an opinion. These are reactions. They demonstrate an inability to manage & direct the personal energy-ecology, in this case of the feelings. It is quite possible to present a reasoned critique / review of Grinderman's (and anyone else's) work, but this would take intention, reflection & consideration. If our response is negative, we have the additional challenge of presenting the negative in a positive fashion. It is more difficult to be critical than supportive, noting that impartial criticism is about as supportive as it gets.
The main problem musicians have these days (apart from whinging about how terrible their life is being ripped off by record companies and those naughty downloaders on that there Internet thingy) is that they are in direct connection with those people who hear, digest and, most importantly, buy their music. In the past, critcism and critique such as I've displayed above would be limited to pub talk or chatter amongst friends:
Discerning Music Fan One: Have you heard the new {insert band name here} album?
Discerning Music Fan Two: Yes, it's a load of old cobblers...
Such off-the-cuff remarks would have never reached the ears of the artiste. Such barbed comments would have been limited to your circle of friends and so the fragile ego of the musician would have been preserved for a brief moment of time until a proper music journalist did a hatchet job on them in the music press and really affected their sales. Because again, most of those music fans in the past would have bought the albums and paid their money before expressing such sentiment.
Nowadays, we have been liberated by the net, because not only can we express our thoughts in the most forthright way and make indirect contact with our idols, we can actually hear the music for free and form our opinions without shelling out our hard-earned cash and being really disappointed by the crud these musicians release as music. The game is up and these chancers who managed to learn four chords on the guitar don't like it that we can pass criticism in a heartbeat. To qualify out opinion we need to quantify it with love, consideration and energy. OK - I'll give it a try in the interest of fairness.
Of course, I read Fripp's reaction and I thought to myself for a moment: "Hey, perhaps I am wrong? Perhaps Old Man Fripp is right. This reaction is hardly an opinion is it? I should go back and listen to this track again and again and again until I find something that I like in it".
Fripp is right my posting is a reaction - all opinion is based on reaction, on previous experiences and that invisible sliding scale in our brains that dictates what we like and don't Iike. Of course, if you hold someone prisoner and beat them enough, they soon learn to love their captor, so perhaps I need to play this song over and over until I form the musical equivalent of Stockholm Syndrome? As someone who immediately got into "Larks' Tongues in Aspic" from King Crimson on the first listen, I am used to engaging with difficult and ugly music.
But now I find myself become facetious and moving away from the task at hand. Let's go back to the Grinderman B-Side and see if there's anything I like about it. When the track starts the guitar noises interest me, but this is stuff I've heard before, most of the music that is presented seems to be familiar and familiar is OK, but the chugging drum and bass motif is satisfying and then Nick Cave starts singing. Now I have no issue with Nick Cave and his music, I am ambivalent towards him, he exists in a stylistic realm that is of no interest to me, but what I am hearing here sounds like someone who is trying too hard.
How can I explain that? It sounds like he's faking it, like he's written these words down and he's trying to force an emotional reaction from himself - at points he sounds as if he's trying to do a bad Elvis impression - and the lyrics appear to me to be utterly meaningless and throw away as if he just wrote down a few lines to sketch out the theme of the song and then riffed over this and improvised until the pot was empty.
I think I was a bit unfair before as I listened to this a third time, I tried to disengage the lyrics from the music and to listen to this as a purely instrumental endeavour and I can see this being a very cinematic piece, and Fripp's guitar work (as I said in my original estimation) really saves this from being a study in monotony. It is classic Fripp stuff and the type of guitar playing that still makes it alright for Fripp to tell me off and for me to take my punishment.
The more you take away the vocals, the more atmospheric the music becomes, but the lyric and vocal performance just turns it into a bit of a comedy show because Nick Cave doesn't put in a convincing performance to me - the energy levels appear to be a bit flat. I get the feeling that Nick Cave wants to channel the vocal stylings of Captain Beefheart or Howlin' Wolf but it just ain't working for me.
But yeah, on my sixth listen, I love it. Sign me up for 20 copies of this song!!! (But I only really love it for the Fripp solo)
Recent Comments